When I purchased this pup I did so without papers but was specifically told he was 75%. When I shared a photo of him with Amanda she told me that since he was born in September, had a defined mask, and white socks that he was probably very low content if any at all and shared several websites for me to gather information on my own, which I did. When I figured out I had been lied to I contacted Renalee and of course she said all of the site's were lying, that he was what she claimed and the only way I could get proof was to pay her $2500.00 for breeder's rights which I did not want, she knew that and thinks she can use that as a tool to keep her lie intact. I did complain to the BBB in Arizona and I will blog about her so others investigate a little more before they purchase a pup from her which they think is one thing and find out it is another. I will include a picture and if any of you believe he is 75% as she claims I would love to hear the other side of this argument.
